Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026 vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
206 km/h
/
4
/
1984 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
19
/
5
5 Doors
4670
4485 mm
1865
1856 mm
1660
1585 mm
2755
2680 mm
/
530 L
/
170 m
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
54
60 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
Front, Thorax, & Curtain Airbags
/
✓
/
Full Size
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
8-SPEED AT (E-Shift/ SBW)
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
197 BHP - 200 BHP
150 BHP - 180 BHP
8-SPEED AT (E-Shift/ SBW) & 8-Speed AT (E-Shift/ SBW) & 8-SPEED AT (E-Shift/ SBW)
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5 Liters (T-GDi), 1,497 cc
/
200 BHP
180 BHP
197 hp / 6,000 rpm
/
253
320 Nm
25.8 kg.m (253 Nm) / 4,000 rpm
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Remote key types
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced standard security system
- Good fuel efficiency
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Medium acceleration capacity
- The entertainment system may lack updates
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026 if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026 has a wheelbase of 2755, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sportage L 1.5L 4X2 SX FOP 2026 uses No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.