SQ6 e-tron vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison

Car Information

598 km

420

800V

/

/

7.3S

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

Engine / Motor

/

160 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5

514

440 L

64

/

/

215/55R18

/

5 Doors

/

4455 mm

/

2050 mm

/

1615 mm

/

2720 mm

/

205 mm

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

11.9

5

Dinamica Microfibre

Leather

Sport Seats Plus

Standard

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

LCD

/

/

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.5

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

TBD

201 BHP

DHT

AT & DHT

Electric

Electric

TBD

420 km

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

/

Electric

Electric

/

201 BHP

/

310 Nm

Motor

Lithium-ion

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

489

/

/

9

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • Atto 3 Premium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAtto 3 Premium

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.