SQ6 e-tron vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
514
414 L
64
/
/
16
/
4341 mm
/
1804 mm
/
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.5
/
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
270
/
11
/
10 min
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
对
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
105 BHP - 153 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
/
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Motor
Lithium-ion
/
489
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.