SQ6 e-tron vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

598 km

≥500

800V

/

/

160+245

/

99

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

514

438 L

64

/

/

5 Doors

/

5209 mm

/

2010 mm

/

1713 mm

/

3110 mm

/

200 m

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

Leather

/

Sport Seats Plus

Bucket

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.5

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

/

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

TBD

429 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Electric

TBD

320 km

5

6 - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

/

Electric

Electric

/

429 BHP

/

300+450

Motor

Lithium-ion

options.Lithium-Ion

489

/

/

8

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • EHS9 Executive

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS9 Executive

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2023 1.6L PE (4x2)

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2)

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Honda | Honda HRV 2019 1.8 i-VTEC LX

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Chery | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.