SQ6 e-tron vs GV70 2.5T Prestige Comparison

Car Information

598 km

/

800V

/

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

514

/

64

/

/

5 Doors

/

4715 mm

/

1910 mm

/

1630 mm

/

2875 mm

Fuel Economy

/

10.8 Km/L

/

66 L

/

10.8 Km/L

Comfort

/

Interior

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

14.5

/

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

/

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

304 BHP - 380 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.5 L

Electric

Gasoline

/

304 BHP

/

422 Nm

Motor

Lithium-ion

/

489

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • GV70 2.5T Prestige

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGV70 2.5T Prestige

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose GV70 2.5T Prestige if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while GV70 2.5T Prestige has a fuel consumption of 9.26. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while GV70 2.5T Prestige has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GV70 2.5T Prestige uses Rear Wheel Drive.