SQ6 e-tron vs Song Plus AWD Comparison

Car Information

598 km

128 KM

800V

/

/

5.9

/

18.3

Engine / Motor

/

180

Dimensions

5

5

514

574

64

/

/

Flush Door

/

1975

/

19

/

5

/

4775

/

1890

/

1680

/

2765

Fuel Economy

/

19.8

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

11.9

12.3

Dinamica Microfibre

Sensatec Leather

Sport Seats Plus

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains

/

Front and Rear

/

/

4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

Infotainment

14.5

15.6-inch rotating screen

/

/

/

/

10

/

Infinity

Battery/Charging

270

/

11

6.6

10 min

/

Transmission

DHT

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

MacPherson

/

Multi- link(5 links)

Wheels/brakes

/

VENTILATED DISC

/

DISC

/

235/50 R19

/

235/50 R19

Key Spec

TBD

/

TBD

197 BHP - 360 BHP

DHT

AT & Automatic

Electric

Hybrid

TBD

/

5

5 - 5

/

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

1.5 L

Electric

Hybrid

/

360 BHP

/

596

Motor

Lithium-ion

Lithium iron phosphate battery

489

/

/

596

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • Song Plus AWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSong Plus AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment; choose Song Plus AWD if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Audi | SQ6 e-tron

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data, while Song Plus AWD has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data, while Song Plus AWD has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Song Plus AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.