Standard 2WD vs Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
197 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2220
/
4710
5110 mm
1930
1925 mm
1620
1847 mm
2875
3043 mm
/
487 L
Fuel Economy
/
9.5 Km/L
56
93 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
11
/
Battery/Charging
30 Min
/
3.3 Hours
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone Front Independent Suspension With Four - Ball Joint
/
Multi-Link Trapezoidal Arm Rear Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5T
3.6 L - 6.4 L
435
290 BHP - 710 BHP
AT
Automatic
Electric & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
3.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
435
290 BHP
325
/
420
353 Nm
Motor
45 Min (30-80%)
/
4.5 Hrs ( 30-80% )
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
R：PMSM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Standard 2WD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Standard 2WD if you care more about power; choose Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Standard 2WD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Standard 2WD has a wheelbase of 2875, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Standard 2WD uses Front Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT Black Top (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.