Standard Petrol 2WD MT vs Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
/
11.0
Engine / Motor
/
169
/
4
Dimensions
5
3 Seater
1970
/
17"
/
5370
5.075
1960
1.785
1880
1.655
3230
3.000
/
/
Fuel Economy
8.33
10.0
80
75
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
MT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
4x2
/
Double Wishbone
/
Leaf Spring
/
Hydraulic
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4
2.4 L
Gasoline
Petrol
158
132 BHP
5500
/
230
202
4000
/
Key Spec
/
2.4 L - 2.5 L
/
128 BHP - 148 BHP
/
Manual
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Standard Petrol 2WD MT
Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
- Rear Defogger
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Standard Petrol 2WD MT if you care more about interior space; choose Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12, while Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a wheelbase of 3230, while Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3.000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Standard Petrol 2WD MT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Standard Petrol 2WD MT uses Rear Drive, while Mitsubishi L200 2018 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.