Standard Petrol 2WD MT vs Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1970
/
17"
/
5370
5410 mm
1960
1934 mm
1880
1886 mm
3230
3230 mm
Fuel Economy
8.33
/
80
80 L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
4x2
/
Double Wishbone
/
Leaf Spring
/
Hydraulic
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
Engine
2.4
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
158
188 BHP
5500
/
230
360 Nm
4000
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
188 - 188
/
8AT & AT8 & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Standard Petrol 2WD MT
Poer 2.0T Top (4WD)
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPoer 2.0T Top (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Standard Petrol 2WD MT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Standard Petrol 2WD MT has a wheelbase of 3230, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3230 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Standard Petrol 2WD MT uses Rear Drive, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.