Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater) vs Sienna LE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
180 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
American
Dimensions
6 Seater
8 Seater
5253 mm
5180 mm
1997 mm
1990 mm
1990 mm
1780 mm
3273 mm
3060 mm
831 L
options. L
/
5 Doors
/
210 m
Fuel Economy
9.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
9.8 Km/L
10 Km/L
/
85 L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
272 BHP
245 BHP - 245 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 11 Seater
8 Seater - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
272 BHP
245 BHP
331 Nm
370 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Sienna LE
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Modern security technologies
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Difficulty maneuvering in confined spaces
- High cost of regular maintenance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStaria 3.5L Van (6 Seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater) if you care more about price; choose Sienna LE if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while Sienna LE has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Sienna LE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater) has a wheelbase of 3273 mm, while Sienna LE has a wheelbase of 3060 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Staria 3.5L Van (6 Seater) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Sienna LE uses All Wheel Drive.