Starray GF+ 2026 4WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4670 mm
4760 mm
1900 mm
1930 mm
1705 mm
1927 mm
2777 mm
2750 mm
650 L
400 L
190 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
54 L
75 L
11 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
PVC Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
9
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L
218 - 218
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
218
224 BHP
325 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Starray GF+ 2026 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Starray GF+ 2026 4WD if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Starray GF+ 2026 4WD has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Starray GF+ 2026 4WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Starray GF+ 2026 4WD has a wheelbase of 2777 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Starray GF+ 2026 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Starray GF+ 2026 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.