Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) vs A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
225 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4726 mm
1870 mm
1842 mm
1400 mm
1427 mm
2905 mm
2820 mm
406 L
480 L
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
17.9 Km/L
60 L
54 L
12.7 Km/L
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
0.0 L - 4.2 L
251 BHP - 365 BHP
120 BHP - 450 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
251 BHP
150 BHP
353 Nm
270 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about price; choose A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) has a wheelbase of 2820 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while A4 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.