Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) vs A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
233 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4939 mm
1870 mm
1886 mm
1400 mm
1457 mm
2905 mm
2924 mm
406 L
530 L
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
60 L
63 L
12.7 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
1.8 L - 4.0 L
251 BHP - 365 BHP
180 BHP - 560 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
251 BHP
190 BHP
353 Nm
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Premium and luxurious interior design
- Excellent performance with powerful engines
- Advanced safety and assistance technologies
Negative
- High maintenance and spare parts cost
- Limited storage space in the box
- Lower fuel efficiency compared to competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about price; choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.