Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) vs Altima 2.5 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
220 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4869 mm
1870 mm
1850 mm
1400 mm
1440 mm
2905 mm
2825 mm
406 L
517 L
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
15.9 Km/L
60 L
61.3 L
12.7 Km/L
15.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
251 BHP - 365 BHP
179 BHP - 270 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
251 BHP
188 BHP
353 Nm
244 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Altima 2.5 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAltima 2.5 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about interior space; choose Altima 2.5 S if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while Altima 2.5 S has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, Altima 2.5 S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while Altima 2.5 S has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Altima 2.5 S uses Front Wheel Drive.