Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
270 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4665 mm
1870 mm
1810 mm
1400 mm
1430 mm
2905 mm
2800 mm
406 L
480 L
/
4 Doors
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
13 Km/L
60 L
66 L
9.4 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
251 BHP - 365 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
365 BHP
241 BHP
510 Nm
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) if you care more about price; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.