Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) vs Maxima 3.5L S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
270 km/h
211 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4905 mm
1870 mm
1860 mm
1400 mm
1435 mm
2905 mm
2775 mm
406 L
402 L
/
4 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
9.6 Km/L
60 L
68 L
9.4 Km/L
9.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
3.5 L
251 BHP - 365 BHP
290 BHP - 300 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
3.3 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
365 BHP
300 BHP
510 Nm
355 Nm
/
V
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Maxima 3.5L S
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMaxima 3.5L S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) if you care more about interior space; choose Maxima 3.5L S if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Maxima 3.5L S has a fuel consumption of 10.42. Therefore, Maxima 3.5L S is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while Maxima 3.5L S has a wheelbase of 2775 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Maxima 3.5L S uses Front Wheel Drive.