Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) vs Octavia 2.0T VRS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
270 km/h
248 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4830 mm
4689 mm
1870 mm
1543 mm
1400 mm
1470 mm
2905 mm
2686 mm
406 L
600 L
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
15.2 Km/L
60 L
66 L
9.4 Km/L
15.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.3 L
/
251 BHP - 365 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
365 BHP
245 BHP
510 Nm
370 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Octavia 2.0T VRS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOctavia 2.0T VRS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) if you care more about interior space; choose Octavia 2.0T VRS if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Octavia 2.0T VRS has a fuel consumption of 6.58. Therefore, Octavia 2.0T VRS is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm, while Octavia 2.0T VRS has a wheelbase of 2686 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Stinger 3.3T AWD Full Option (370 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Octavia 2.0T VRS uses Front Wheel Drive.