SU7 RWD vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

260 km/h

Chinese

GCC

/

4

/

1998 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4997 mm

4665 mm

1963 mm

1810 mm

1455 mm

1430 mm

3000 mm

2800 mm

517 L

480 L

/

140 m

Fuel Economy

/

13 Km/L

/

66 L

/

13 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

16.1

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

295 BHP - 673 BHP

241 BHP - 312 BHP

TBD

8 Speed Sport Direct Shift

Electric

Petrol & Gasoline

668 km - 800 km

/

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

/

2.0 L - 3.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

295 BHP

241 BHP

400 Nm

350 Nm

/

In-Line

/

2.0 L

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Motor

10

/

options.Lithium

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SU7 RWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • IS 300 Premier 2.0L

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickSU7 RWD

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose SU7 RWD if you care more about price; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Xiaomi | SU7 RWD

    VS

    Ford | Ford Taurus 2022 2.0L EcoBoost Trend

    Xiaomi | SU7 RWD

    VS

    Ford | Ford Taurus 2021 2.0L EcoBoost Trend

    Xiaomi | SU7 RWD

    VS

    Dodge | Dodge Charger 2021 3.6L SXT (Base)

    Xiaomi | SU7 RWD

    VS

    Toyota | Camry LE 2.5L

    Xiaomi | SU7 RWD

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Camry 2020 3.5L SE (298 HP)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, SU7 RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, SU7 RWD has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, SU7 RWD, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SU7 RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.