CarteaCompare CarsSU7 Ultra vs ES300h Platinum 2.5L

SU7 Ultra vs ES300h Platinum 2.5L Comparison

Car Information

630

/

Engine / Motor

350 km/h

260 km/h

Chinese

GCC

/

4

/

2490 cc

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4997 mm

4975 mm

1963 mm

1865 mm

1455 mm

1445 mm

3000 mm

2870 mm

517 L

450 L

/

150 m

Fuel Economy

/

15 Km/L

/

50 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

Smart Entry

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Dual Zone

Dual Zone

/

/

/

Electric

Electric

Bucket

Standard

Safety

Infotainment

16.1

12.3

Android LCD

Android LCD

12

17

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

1548 BHP

204 BHP - 302 BHP

DHT

CVT & Direct Shift, 8AT & E-CVT

Electric

Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid

800 km

/

5

5 Seater - 5 Seater

/

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

LED

LED

Engine

Electric

Hybrid

1548 BHP

204 BHP

1770 Nm

356 Nm

/

In-Line

/

2.5 L

/

None

/

4

Motor

3

/

options.Lithium

/

Technologies

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SU7 Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • ES300h Platinum 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Luxurious and refined interior design
  • Economical in fuel consumption
  • Smooth and comfortable driving performance

Negative

  • Narrow rear cargo space
  • The infotainment system is relatively old
  • A higher price than competitors in the same category

Related comparisons

Editor's PickES300h Platinum 2.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SU7 Ultra if you care more about interior space; choose ES300h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Xiaomi | SU7 Ultra

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2024 2.0T B6 MHEV Ultimate Bright (AWD)

Xiaomi | SU7 Ultra

VS

Audi | Audi A4 2022 S4 (354 HP)

Xiaomi | SU7 Ultra

VS

Audi | Audi A4 2021 S4 (354 HP)

Xiaomi | SU7 Ultra

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2020 2.0T Limited Edition (250 PS)

Xiaomi | SU7 Ultra

VS

Volvo | Volvo S90 2018 T6 Inscription Plus

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SU7 Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SU7 Ultra has a wheelbase of 3000 mm, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, SU7 Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SU7 Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while ES300h Platinum 2.5L uses Four Wheel Drive.