Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i vs Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS Comparison
Car Information
11.5
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
180
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.595
4655
1.796
1835
1.686
1760
2.640
2750
974
/
Fuel Economy
9.5
10.2
60
52
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 3.0 L
150 BHP - 170 BHP
144 BHP - 264 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
170 BHP
149 BHP
235
255
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i if you care more about power; choose Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a wheelbase of 2.640, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i uses All Wheel Drive, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS uses Front Wheel Drive.