Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
11.5
10.9
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.595
4.314
1.796
1.809
1.686
1.624
2.640
2.585
974
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
9.5
17.2
60
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
150 BHP - 170 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
170 BHP
112 BHP
235
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSubaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i has a wheelbase of 2.640, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.