Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
11.8
/
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
188
/
4
N/A
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.625
5.075
1.815
1.969
1.730
1.716
2.670
2.930
974
/
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
48
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
150 BHP - 170 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
156 BHP
226 BHP
194
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2.670, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.