Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
11.8
10.9
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
188
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
✓
4.625
4.314
1.815
1.809
1.730
1.624
2.670
2.585
974
448
Fuel Economy
14.9
17.2
48
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
150 BHP - 170 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Petrol
156 BHP
112 BHP
194
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2.670, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Subaru Forester 2024 Subaru Forester 2024 2.0i Mid Option uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.