Suzuki APV 2016 GLX vs M4 Cargo Van Comparison
Engine / Motor
150
160
4
4
Dimensions
8 Seater
2
4230
5200
1655
1890
1865
1980
2625
3080
2000
/
Fuel Economy
12.0
/
46
80
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L
2.0 L
91 BHP
145 BHP
Automatic & Manual
5MT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 8 Seater
2 - 9
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
91 BHP
145 BHP
127
185
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki APV 2016 GLX
- Rear AC Controls
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
M4 Cargo Van
- Rear AC Controls
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki APV 2016 GLX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki APV 2016 GLX if you care more about price; choose M4 Cargo Van if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki APV 2016 GLX has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while M4 Cargo Van has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki APV 2016 GLX has a wheelbase of 2625, while M4 Cargo Van has a wheelbase of 3080. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Cargo Van, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki APV 2016 GLX uses Front Wheel Drive, while M4 Cargo Van uses Front Wheel Drive.