Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs 308 1.6L GT Line Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
188 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
4253 mm
1600
1863 mm
1540
1472 mm
2425
2610 mm
254
420 L
Fuel Economy
23.3
15.4 Km/L
35
60 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.6 L
67 BHP
120 BHP - 163 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
163 BHP
90
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
308 1.6L GT Line
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about price; choose 308 1.6L GT Line if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while 308 1.6L GT Line has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while 308 1.6L GT Line has a wheelbase of 2610 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 308 1.6L GT Line, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while 308 1.6L GT Line uses Front Wheel Drive.