Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs MG3 Lux 2WD 2024 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
/
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
/
1600
/
1540
/
2425
/
254
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
23.3
17.8
35
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.5 L
67 BHP
109 BHP
Automatic & Manual
CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
109 BHP
90
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
MG3 Lux 2WD 2024
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about price; choose MG3 Lux 2WD 2024 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while MG3 Lux 2WD 2024 has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while MG3 Lux 2WD 2024 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG3 Lux 2WD 2024 uses No data.