Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs Scala 1.6L Ambition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
188 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
4362 mm
1600
1793 mm
1540
1471 mm
2425
2649 mm
254
467 L
Fuel Economy
23.3
16.1 Km/L
35
50 L
/
16.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.6 L
67 BHP
110 BHP
Automatic & Manual
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
110 BHP
90
155 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
Scala 1.6L Ambition
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickScala 1.6L Ambition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about fuel economy; choose Scala 1.6L Ambition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while Scala 1.6L Ambition has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while Scala 1.6L Ambition has a wheelbase of 2649 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Scala 1.6L Ambition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Scala 1.6L Ambition uses Front Wheel Drive.