Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs Swift 1.2L GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
165 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3600
3840 mm
1600
1735 mm
1540
1495 mm
2425
2450 mm
254
265 L
Fuel Economy
23.3
16.1 Km/L
35
37 L
/
16.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.2 L - 1197 L
67 BHP
82 BHP - 136 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.0 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
82 BHP
90
113 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
Swift 1.2L GL
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Smooth and flexible command and control
- Economical fuel consumption
- Modern and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Narrow rear seats and storage space
- Driving comfort and suspension need to be improved
- Lack of technology and accessories details
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about price; choose Swift 1.2L GL if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while Swift 1.2L GL has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while Swift 1.2L GL has a wheelbase of 2450 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Swift 1.2L GL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Swift 1.2L GL uses Front Wheel Drive.