Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T vs Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
155
190 km/h
3
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
3600
4220 mm
1600
1790 mm
1540
1399 mm
2425
2650 mm
254
320 L
Fuel Economy
23.3
13.9 Km/L
35
50 L
/
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.1 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
67 BHP
127 BHP - 204 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
67 BHP
147 BHP
90
179 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- ABS
Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVeloster 2.0L MPI Mid
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T if you care more about fuel economy; choose Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a fuel consumption of 4.29, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T has a wheelbase of 2425, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Celerio 2017 1.0L A/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid uses Front Wheel Drive.