Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport vs ET5 Standard Range Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4650
4790
1820
1960
1470
1499
2700
2888 mm
461
options. L
/
4 Doors
/
options. mm
Fuel Economy
12.8
/
63
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
176 BHP
320 BHP
230
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
TBD
/
320 BHP
/
AT
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
ET5 Standard Range
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Steering Adjustment
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Futuristic and distinctive exterior design
- Advanced technological configuration
- Exceptional driving performance and dynamics
Negative
- Higher pricing
- Incomplete after-sales service network
- Areas for improvement in detail craftsmanship
Related comparisons
Editor's PickET5 Standard Range
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport if you care more about overall equipment; choose ET5 Standard Range if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport has a fuel consumption of 7.81, while ET5 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport has a wheelbase of 2700, while ET5 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET5 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Kizashi 2016 Sport uses Front Wheel Drive, while ET5 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive .