Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
160 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4150
4490 mm
1755
1874 mm
1605
1613 mm
2500
2750 mm
253
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
/
42
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
150 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
CVT
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
150 BHP
305 BHP
190
680 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.