Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
185 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4150
4440 mm
1755
1833 mm
1605
1560 mm
2500
2700 mm
253
330 L
Fuel Economy
13.9
13.5 Km/L
42
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
150 BHP
/
CVT
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
130 BHP
190
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor has a wheelbase of 2500, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS Sport 1.8L Classic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor uses All Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.