Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4175
4275 mm
1775
1765 mm
1610
1535 mm
2500
2570 mm
375
240 L
Fuel Economy
17.2
15.4 Km/L
47
48 L
/
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1586 L
2.0 L
115 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
148 BHP
156
192 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX3 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX3 2.0L GT (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.