Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD vs CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4175
5075 mm
1775
1969 mm
1610
1716 mm
2500
2930 mm
375
407 L
Fuel Economy
17.2
11.8 Km/L
47
74 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1586 L
2.5 L - 2500 L
115 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
230 BHP
156
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
CX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX9 2.5T GS (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX9 2.5T GS (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Suzuki Vitara 2024 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while CX9 2.5T GS (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.