T Roc R-Line vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4251
4760 mm
1819
1930 mm
1594
1927 mm
2603
2750 mm
445
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
15.8
10 Km/L
50
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
8
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For Front And Rear Passengers Incl. Side Airbags In Front.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.4 L
2.0 L
150 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8 Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
224 BHP
250
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
T Roc R-Line
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Wheel Bolt With Anti-theft Protection(Unlockable)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose T Roc R-Line if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, T Roc R-Line has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, T Roc R-Line is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, T Roc R-Line has a wheelbase of 2603, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T Roc R-Line uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.