T60 Diesel 4X4 2025 vs Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
180 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5365
5370 mm
1900
1918 mm
1809
1884 mm
3155
3270 mm
/
4 Doors
/
1200 L
/
230 m
Fuel Economy
/
8 Km/L
/
80 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.8 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
136 BHP - 224 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Automatic & Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.8 L
2.0 L
Diesel
Diesel
147 BHP
168 BHP
360
405 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
T60 Diesel 4X4 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose T60 Diesel 4X4 2025 if you care more about price; choose Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, T60 Diesel 4X4 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, T60 Diesel 4X4 2025 has a wheelbase of 3155, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) has a wheelbase of 3270 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T60 Diesel 4X4 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Ranger XL 2.0T (LOW) uses Four Wheel Drive.