T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
175
/
5
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1880
/
16
/
5365
5.362
1900
1.976
1809
1.816
3155
3.221
215
/
/
1180
Fuel Economy
/
11.1
/
80
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double Wishbone
/
Leaf Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
245/70 R16 AT
/
245/70 R16 AT
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.8 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
147 BHP - 215 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
6AT & 6MT
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
215 BHP
200 BHP
160
/
330
470
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite if you care more about price; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite has a wheelbase of 3155, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.