T99 vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1805
/
20 inch
/
4800
4341 mm
1915
1804 mm
1685
1693 mm
2870
2676 mm
377
414 L
Fuel Economy
13.8
17.2 Km/L
60
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
221 BHP - 224
105 BHP - 135 BHP
8AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
224
115 BHP
165
/
340
156 Nm
95
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
T99
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose T99 if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, T99 has a fuel consumption of 7.25, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, T99 has a wheelbase of 2870, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T99, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. T99 uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.