Tahoe LS vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
8
4
5297 cc
1998 cc
American
Chinese
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5351 mm
4760 mm
2057 mm
1930 mm
1927 mm
1927 mm
3073 mm
2750 mm
722 L
400 L
203 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
91 L
75 L
7 Km/L
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
10 Speed AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
5.3 L - 6.2 L
2.0 L
320 BHP - 420 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
10 Speed AT & 10AT & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 9 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
5.3 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
5.3L EcoTec3 V8
/
4
4
355 BHP
224 BHP
518 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tahoe LS
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tahoe LS if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tahoe LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tahoe LS has a wheelbase of 3073 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe LS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tahoe LS uses Four Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.