Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Voyah Free AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
Dimensions
7
5
5040
4905
1996
1950
1760
1645
2950
2960
/
2260
/
560-1320
/
113-211
Fuel Economy
/
14.9
/
56
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front & Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Double Wishbone
/
Multi Link
Wheels/brakes
/
255/45 R20
/
255/45 R20
Key Spec
TBD
/
680 BHP
482 BHP - 489 BHP
DHT
AT
Electric
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
/
7
5 - 5
/
0.0 L -
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
680 BHP
482 BHP
/
1.5
/
720
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
Double
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tang L EV 670 Standard
Voyah Free AWD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price; choose Voyah Free AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data, while Voyah Free AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950, while Voyah Free AWD has a wheelbase of 2960. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Voyah Free AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data, while Voyah Free AWD uses All Wheel Drive.