Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
7
5
5040
4500
1996
1842
1760
1746
2950
2670
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
/
16.6
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
DHT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
680 BHP
154 - 197 BHP
DHT
6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
7
5
/
1.5 L - 1.6 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
197 BHP
/
1.6 L
/
1.6L TDGI
/
290
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tang L EV 670 Standard
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tang L EV 670 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.