Tang L EV 670 Standard vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
7
5040
4749 mm
1996
1900 mm
1760
1720 mm
2950
2745 mm
/
5 Doors
/
480 L
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
/
13 Km/L
/
57 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
680 BHP
197 - 197
DHT
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
7
7 - 7
/
1.6 L - 1.6 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
680 BHP
197 BHP
/
In-Line
/
1.6 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
290 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tang L EV 670 Standard
X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price; choose X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2745 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tang L EV 670 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.