Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T vs AITO 7 - 6 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
6
4985
5020
1960
1945
1900
1760
2850
2820
/
21"
Fuel Economy
11.3
/
/
60
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
Automatic
single-speed AT transmission
Chassis & Steering
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0
1.5L
252 BHP
449 hp
Automatic
single-speed AT transmission
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
6
Engine
2.0
1.5L
Hybrid
Hybrid
252 BHP
449 hp
/
Turbocharge
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
/
660Front：300/Rear：360
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
Technologies
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T
AITO 7 - 6 seater
- Welcome Light
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAITO 7 - 6 seater
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T if you care more about interior space; choose AITO 7 - 6 seater if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T has a fuel consumption of 8.85, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T has a wheelbase of 2850, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T uses No data, while AITO 7 - 6 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.