Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
5
5
4985
4500
1960
1842
1900
1746
2850
2670
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
11.3
16.6
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Key Spec
2.0
/
252 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Hybrid
/
TBD
/
5
/
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
252 BHP
197 BHP
/
1.6L TDGI
/
290
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T has a fuel consumption of 8.85, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T has a wheelbase of 2850, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 400 HEV Hi4-T uses No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.