Tank 700 Ultimate vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
3110
/
20"
/
5090
4341 mm
2061
1804 mm
1952
1693 mm
3000
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
85
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9 Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Front four-wheel drive
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Ventilated Disc
/
275/60 R20
/
275/60 R20
/
Engine
3.0T
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
360
115 BHP
800
156 Nm
95
/
aluminum alloy
/
aluminum alloy
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tank 700 Ultimate
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tank 700 Ultimate if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tank 700 Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 10.9, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tank 700 Ultimate has a wheelbase of 3000, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 700 Ultimate, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tank 700 Ultimate uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.