CarteaCompare Cars Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) vs DFSK C32 Standard

Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) vs DFSK C32 Standard Comparison

Car Information

8.5

/

Engine / Motor

180

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

14"

5.410

4940

1.930

1655

1.890

1910

3.270

3050

/

1172

/

2060x1540x370

/

/

/

2295

Fuel Economy

80

/

/

18

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Manual

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Macpherson Independent Suspension

/

Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

/

/

Disc

/

Drum

/

175 R14 LT

/

175 R14 LT

Key Spec

2.2 L - 2.5 L

1.5

207 BHP - 277 BHP

114

6 Speed M/T or 8 Speed A/T & 8 Speed A/T or 6 Speed M/T & Automatic

Manual

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.5

Petrol

Gasoline

2.5 T GDI

/

277 BHP

114

421

/

/

In-Line

/

Naturally Aspirated

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • DFSK C32 Standard

    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDFSK C32 Standard

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) if you care more about power; choose DFSK C32 Standard if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 TRX 2018 6.2L V8 (575 HP)

Kia | Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

VS

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

Kia | Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

VS

Maxus | T60 Petrol Double Cab 4WD Elite

Kia | Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

VS

Maxus | T60 Diesel Double Cab 2WD Comfort

Kia | Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD)

VS

Maxus | T60 Diesel Double Cab 4WD Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while DFSK C32 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3.270, while DFSK C32 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C32 Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tasman 2025 2.5T EX (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while DFSK C32 Standard uses Rear Drive.