Taurus Titanium vs S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+ Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

250 km/h

4

/

1998 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

19

/

5 Doors

/

4972 mm

5051 mm

1875 mm

2108 mm

1498 mm

1422 mm

2930 mm

2945 mm

520 L

400 L

205 mm

/

Fuel Economy

15.5Km/L

10.8 Km/L

66 L

80 L

/

10.8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

8" Digital

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

8

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

13.2

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

Transmission

8-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/45 R19

/

235/45 R19

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.5 L

4.0 L

232 BHP - 365 BHP

601 BHP

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

239 BHP

601 BHP

382 Nm

900 Nm

Technologies

/

/

Normal, Sport, Eco

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Taurus Titanium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTaurus Titanium

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Taurus Titanium if you care more about price; choose S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Taurus Titanium

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model 3 2020 Long Range (AWD)

Ford | Taurus Titanium

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model 3 2019 Long Range (AWD)

Ford | Taurus Titanium

VS

Xpeng | Xpeng P7+ AWD Performance

Ford | Taurus Titanium

VS

Audi | Audi A6 2022 40 TFSI (190 HP)

Ford | Taurus Titanium

VS

Audi | Audi A6 2021 40 TFSI (190 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Taurus Titanium has a fuel consumption of 6.45, while S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.26. Therefore, Taurus Titanium is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Taurus Titanium has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2945 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Taurus Titanium uses Front Drive, while S 63 AMG Coupe 4.0L 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.