Taurus Titanium Hybrid vs C 63 AMG Comparison
Car Information
220 Nm/115(Battery)
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
19
/
5 Doors
/
4972 mm
/
1875 mm
/
1498 mm
/
2930 mm
/
520 L
/
205 mm
/
Fuel Economy
23.4
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8" Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
232 BHP - 365 BHP
204 BHP - 451 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
/
Hybrid
/
4
/
185HP/64HP(Battery)
/
382 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Eco
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Taurus Titanium Hybrid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
C 63 AMG
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Taurus Titanium Hybrid if you care more about power; choose C 63 AMG if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Taurus Titanium Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 4.27, while C 63 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Taurus Titanium Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2930 mm, while C 63 AMG has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Taurus Titanium Hybrid uses Front Drive, while C 63 AMG uses No data.