Taycan 4S vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
315 km/h
/
8
/
3982 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4 Seater
2 Seater
4963 mm
4728 mm
1966 mm
1984 mm
1381 mm
1354 mm
2900 mm
2700 mm
429 L
350 L
/
2 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
4 Km/L
/
80 L
/
4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
408 BHP - 680 BHP
462 BHP - 585 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Electric
Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater
2 Seater
/
4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
571 BHP
577 BHP
640 Nm
800 Nm
/
V
/
4.0 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Taycan 4S
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
AMG GT 63 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAMG GT 63 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Taycan 4S if you care more about interior space; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Taycan 4S has a fuel consumption of No data, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Taycan 4S has a wheelbase of 2900 mm, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Taycan 4S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Taycan 4S uses All Wheel Drive, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.