Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15 vs RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3.8 Liter
/
/
280 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
20
/
5000
4507 mm
1990
1851 mm
1750
1557 mm
/
2681 mm
/
530 L
Fuel Economy
71
64 L
/
14.9 Km/L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear Occupant Alert
/
Infotainment
8
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Harman/Kardon Speakers + Ext. Amp + Surround Sound
/
Transmission
8 Speed AT
/
8 Speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING
/
/
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
/
Key Spec
3.8 L - 3.8 L
/
291 - 291
/
8 Speed AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 8
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.8 Liters GDi, 3,778 cc, 6 Cylinders
/
6
/
291 BHP
400 BHP
291 hp / 6,000 rpm
/
36.2 Kg.m / 5,200 rpm
/
/
480 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15 if you care more about overall equipment; choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15 has a fuel consumption of No data, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15 has a wheelbase of No data, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Telluride 3.8L, SX PRM-15 uses No data, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive.